All standards for living and through the universal forces of equilibrium are predetermined by our responsibilities to, first and foremost, distinguish between quality and quantity.
Unfortunately, in the first instances and experiences of language, the first form of language affecting this stage in language from what was to follow for interactive communication to succeed, was the language of cuneiform.
Cuneiform was the ability to interact with each other through numbers, when for the development of farming and agriculture, the calculations that were necessary to feed the world, numbers, and the quantity of actions needed to be taken to produce the quantity of food, set the stage for the evolution of all language. So, quantity may have predetermined quality in all areas of life.
Is by Being, the natural ability to qualify the quality of our existence as distinct from quantifying how much time we shall exist.
In modern times, however, it is how we succeed and by asking ourself in life, are we qualified?
Until now, by being qualified has been measured, unfortunately, by how much information we know; how much money we quantifiably make, how big a house we live in, how fast our cars go, how much we eat, how many bad cells exist and accumulate over how many good cells exist that determine how we treat our bodily conditions, as distinct from the quality of our well-being.
We then measure what we do to our bodies and then measure the quantity of time we spend on treating ourselves and treating our relationships with others as distinct from being who we are with each other that represents not the quantity of time spent, but the quality of time spent on ourselves and with each other.
Therefore, the question maybe, shall we succeed if we’re not being true to ourselves reflecting the quality of our lives? Maybe By Being true to ourselves, reflecting the quality of our lives in all experiences, determines everything we do in life.
By being, is this how we shall control the quality of life, our lives and other people’s lives, by interacting with each other, by being true to ourselves and with each other as distinct from arguing and reacting with each other or reacting to circumstances surrounding us when we realize we have no control under such reactions.
Can we only respond when we distinguish who we’re being and fully understand that the quality of life is at stake to sustain an agreeable, global standard of living, enhancing our sense of belonging.
So, before you do anything, ask yourself, is it the quality of your interactions that are more valuable or the quantity over the quality of your actions which may restrict you in the long-term and the short-term.
Herein lies the ultimate power of choice, choosing who we’re being over what we do. Is such a distinction between being and doing, determining how we shall control the quality of life prolonging the extension of life in the future.
Is qualifying the quality of life reenforcing and extending our sense of belonging or is the future of life based upon quantifying more of the same through the language as predetermined by numbers?
